Monday 9 September 2013

Redeem MUSO's Sovereignity.




Campus is now live with MUSO politics. Soon the 26th SGC will be dissolved and that means the office will be void prompting need for new leaders. Many comrades have shown interest in various dockets in the incoming 27th SGC. Though the campaigns have not officially kicked off, it is known which comrades are aspiring for which dockets. Everybody has his or her own opinion on the performance of the outgoing 26th SGC. Most comrades believe that they failed the students while others think they did all they could for the students.
Those we remember Mr. Mwamburi Mwangombe will always recall his statement during the dissolution of the 25th SGC. When he said that the comrades will miss his leadership, a section of those present at the function booed him. Does the 26th SGC compare favourably with the 25th SGC in terms of performance? Has much changed positively? In the reign of the 25th SGC, flow of information from the Administration and the SGC was commendable. Weekly updates from MUSO were always posted on the main notice board at the students’ centre. There was The Illuminator which MUSO used to update students of its activities, but what remained of The Illuminator when the 26th SGC took office? After a heated disagreement among the directors the publication underwent a natural death.
Where could we have messed? Do the students have a hand in the failure of the outgoing SGC?
Solving students' problems is not all about attacking the University's Administration by mere words. That does no good to the students, instead coming up with ways of convincing the Administration to look into the affairs of the students would be the best way out. when students vote in MUSO directors, they always give them the mandate to make the University Administration aware of the needs of students and find solutions to those needs.
After witnessing the performance of the 26th SGC, campaigns by aspirants full of attacks on the administration without stating how they will make the administration understand and solve the students' problems will be of no importantance to the students. The outgoing SGC gave the comrades alot of hopes with their activist campaigns. Ironically it turned out that the same SGC made the comrades feel no need of having MUSO. Some comrades now believe they can survive in this campus without the now turned toothless students' governing body. When Technology students went on rampage in 2011, it took the efforts of Mwamburi and his team to convince the administration to let the students back from the indefinate vocation they had been given.
Those aspiring to serve in the incoming SGC should know that the student fraternity need solutions to their problems and this takes more than dog whistling politics to redeem students' trust in MUSO. It is a humble responsibility of the incoming SGC to redeem MUSO's Sovereignity.